Gray v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Stephen Dewayne Gray
Defendant: Rolonda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall
Case Number: 2:2022cv00459
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Stephen Michael Doyle
Referring Judge: Myron H Thompson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Received Email from ALND regarding receipt of e-transfer case; ALND case number assigned as 5:22-cv-01048. (NO PDF attached to this entry) (am, )
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER: This lawsuit is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the case be transferred to the USDC, Northern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C 2241(d). Also before the court are petitioner's objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. #4 ) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. #2 ) is adopted. (3) This case is transferred to the USDC for the Northern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to take appropriate steps to effect the transfer. This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OBJECTION to #2 Recommendations by Stephen Dewayne Gray. (am, )
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Case transferred electronically to USDC, Northern District of Alabama via CM/ECF to Clerk. (No pdf attached to this entry) (dmn, )
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Habeas Filing fee received: $5.00, receipt number 4602067535. (am, )
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/2/2022. (dmn, )
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Stephen Dewayne Gray. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(hrs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Dewayne Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rolonda Calloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven T. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?