Woodruff v. Cargle et al (INMATE 4)
Plaintiff: John Michael Woodruff
Defendant: Camelia Cargle and Steven T. Marshall
Case Number: 2:2022cv00622
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Chad W Bryan
Referring Judge: Emily C Marks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order No objections filed to the #7 Recommendation. (no pdf attached) (cwl, )
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that these proceedings be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241(d); It is further ORDERED that, by 11/7/2022, the parties may file written objections to this Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan on 10/24/2022. (es, )
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's #3 motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED; It is further ORDERED that this case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/19/2022. (es, )
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's #4 motion for extraordinary special assignment is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/19/2022. (es, )
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Extraordinary Special Assignment by John Michael Woodruff. (bll, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/19/2022) (es, ). Modified on 10/19/2022 to replace with file stamped document. (es, ).
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Orders of Prohibition and Protection by John Michael Woodruff, CONSTRUED as a MOTION for a Temporary Restraining Order (bll, ) Modified on 10/19/2022 (es, ).
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM of Facts and Law in Support re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Michael Woodruff. (bll, )
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 462.), filed by John Michael Woodruff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Receipt)(bll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodruff v. Cargle et al (INMATE 4)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Michael Woodruff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Camelia Cargle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven T. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?