Sanders v. Trump et al (MAG+)
| Jarmal Jabbar Sanders |
| Donald Trump, Kay Ivey and Lynnethia Bennett |
| 2:2022cv00691 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Jerusha T Adams |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #9 Opinion & #10 Judgment sent to Jarmal Jabbar Sanders were returned with the following notation: "Return to Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable to Forward". (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
|
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. #6 Recommendation sent to Jamal Jabbar Sanders was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable To Forward." (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: 1) The United States Magistrate Judge's #6 recommendation is adopted; 2) Pages two through five of the #1 complaint are stricken as impertinent, immaterial, and scandalous; 3) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) prior to service of process and without an opportunity to amend; No costs are taxed; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/21/2023. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 9
OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/21/2023. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #7 Motion to Serve Defendants Via Publication. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 1/9/2023. (amf, )
|
|
No objections filed to the #6 Recommendation. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for to Serve Defendants Via Publication by Jarmal Jabbar Sanders. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 6
RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; Further, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that 1. Pages two through five of the Complaint be stricken as impertinent, immaterial, and scandalous; and 2. The Complaint be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) prior to service of process and without an opportunity to amend; Objections to R&R due by 1/6/2023. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 12/22/2022. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE: it is ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 USC 636, this case is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration and disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/16/2022. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 4
DECLARATION of the Pro Se Party filed by Jarmal Jabbar Sanders. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement filed by Jarmal Jabbar Sanders. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Jarmal Jabbar Sanders. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP (Short Form), #2 Application IFP (Long Form))(amf, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Lynnethia Bennett, Kay Ivey, Donald Trump, filed by Jarmal Jabbar Sanders; 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 3/7/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
