Lee v. Calloway et al (INMATE 1)
Rashad C. Lee |
Rolanda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall |
2:2023cv00129 |
March 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Charles S Coody |
Myron H Thompson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filing Fee Received: $ 5.00, receipt number 1813 (dmn, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER: it is ORDERED that, on or before 3/27/2023, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an affidavit in support of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a copy of his prison account statement reflecting the balance in his prison account when he filed his 2254 Petition, as further set out in Order; DIRECTING the Clerk to (1) provide Petitioner with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and (2) provide a copy of this Order to the inmate account clerk at the facility where Petitioner is detained, as further set out in Order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/13/2023. (mailed w/ IFP form; Furnished: Inmate Account Clerk @ ECF)(am, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Rashad C. Lee.(NO IFP; NO FILING FEE) (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(zhp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.