Huntley v. Astrue
||Michael J. Astrue
||September 24, 2010
||Alabama Middle District Court
||Charles S. Coody
|Nature of Suit:
||Supplemental Security Income
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 26, 2012
ORDER directing as follows: (1.) That the 17 motion for attorney's fees be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent that the plaintiff be and is hereby AWARDED fees in the amount of $3,770.24; (2.) To the extent that plaintiff's counsel r equests that fees should be awarded to directly to counsel, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) authorizes the court to award fees to the prevailing party. See 28 U.S.C. § (d)(2)(B). See also Reeves, supra. The motion that fees be paid directly to counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 4/26/12. (Furnished to Cashier.) (scn, )
|January 17, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that this case will be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion; further ORDERED that the plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after he receives notice of an y amount of past due benefits awarded to seek attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); a separate order will issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/17/12. (Furnished via USPS to SSA Hearings/Appeals and SSA Chief Judge)(scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?