McKeen v. U-Haul International, Inc. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 17, 2013
OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) The 122 consent motion to substitute parties is granted; (2) Sovran Holdings, Inc. is dismissed without prejudice; (3) Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership is substituted for Sovran Holdings, Inc. as a defendant; (4) Plaintiff is to file an amended complaint, that meets the requirements of this order, by no later than January 24, 2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/17/13. (scn, )
|December 4, 2012
ORDER directing that the 104 motion for extension of deadline is granted as requested. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/4/12. (scn, )
|July 6, 2012
ORDER directing that the 82 motion to extend time is denied, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/6/12. (scn, )
|January 6, 2012
JUDGMENT directing that, pursuant to the 32 Notice of Dismissal, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that defendant Eberly Transportation, d/b/a Two Men and a Truck, and the claims against it, are dismissed without prejudice, as furt her set out; The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP; Eberly Transportation, d/b/a Two Men and a Truck, is terminated as a main defendant; Said party is still in this case as a crossclaim defendant. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/6/12. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?