Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DAGENHART v. BISIGNANO
as 4:2026cv00166
Plaintiff:
DAVID WALKER DAGENHART
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ARIEL SEAFOODS OF FLORIDA, INC. et al v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE et al
as 1:2025cv03117
Plaintiff:
ARIEL SEAFOODS OF FLORIDA, INC., JENSEN TUNA, LLC, WATER STREET SEAFOOD, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and HOWARD LUTNICK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Walker v. Deputy Schreiber (#51745) et al
as 1:2025cv01434
Plaintiff:
David Walker
Defendant:
Deputy Schreiber (#51745), Deputy Fonbuena (#62264), Josephine County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00428
Plaintiff:
Mark David Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jared David Walker v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv07041
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jared David Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Camfil USA, Inc. v. McSwain et al
as 1:2024cv01554
Defendant:
TEJAS MAINTENANCE SERVICES CORP. DBA DUSTLESS AIR FILTER COMPANY, TIMOTHY M. MCSWAIN and MARK DAVID WALKER
Plaintiff:
CAMFIL USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Walker et al v. Competition Tire East, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Jean Walker and David Walker
Defendant:
Competition Tire East Inc. doing business as Penske Racing Shocks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SCHROEDER v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Defendant:
K. GILMORE, JEREMY HAMILTON, DAWN JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
