Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Walker v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05348
Plaintiff:
David Walker
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Ill Street Police Departmeant Court Room et al
as 1:2019cv05853
Defendant:
Ill Street Police Departmeant Court Room
Plaintiff:
David Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Dart
as 1:2019cv05200
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Plaintiff:
David Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv05726
Defendant:
County of Cook, IL, Thomas Neal, Joseph Ranzino and others
Plaintiff:
Wilford Ferguson, I.V. Newson, Victor Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Walker v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv07710
Plaintiff:
David Walker
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Bank of America
as 1:2017cv07714
Plaintiff:
Sonya Davis, Mack Glover, Steven Segura and others
Defendant:
Bank of America , US Bank Trust National Association , Bank New York Mellon USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Gramley et al
as 1:2014cv01292
Plaintiff:
Johnny David Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Richard . Gramley, Louis Lowery, Zeir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler et al v. Regional Acceptance Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv04154
Plaintiff:
Deloris Butler , David Walker and Emma Walker
Defendant:
Regional Acceptance Corporation, Unknown Repossession Company and Unknown Repossession Agent
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Collins et al v. Ostrowski
as 2:2010cv02095
Plaintiff:
Dustin Collins , Lawrence Moye , Debra Blanchard and others
Defendant:
Thomas Ostrowski
Petitioner:
Ernesto Perez and Deborah Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
