Ashmore v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
| Frederick Maurice Ashmore |
| Jay Jones, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama |
| 3:2021cv00845 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE:: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice because Ashmore has failed to comply with the Court's #2 order that he either submit the $5.00 filing fee or a properly completed IFP application; Objections to R&R due by 3/3/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 2/17/2022. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 1/25/2022, Petitioner must submit the $5.00 filing fee or file the appropriate affidavit supporting a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, as further set out in order; DIRECTING the Clerk to send Petitioner a form for filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 1/3/2022. (Application IFP form mailed as directed) (Furnished: Cashier) (amf, )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Frederick Maurice Ashmore. (Writ of Certiorari)(NO IFP; NO FILING FEE) (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document)(bll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
