Jemison v. Givens et al
| Bernard Jemison |
| G Givens, L Smith, Johnson, Joshua and Scott |
| 2:2021cv01266 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Anna M Manasco |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS magistrate judges report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. The court DENIES the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. #2 . Mr. Jemison failed to pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $402.00 at the time he filed this complaint, the court ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 10/27/2021. (DNW)
|
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION- The undersigned RECOMMENDS the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED and this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Any objections are due within fourteen days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/5/21. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bernard Jemison. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G Givens, Johnson, Joshua, Scott, L Smith, filed by Bernard Jemison.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
