Collins v. Jenkins et al
Rosemary Collins |
Mohammad Jenkins, Phyllis Morgan, Gwendolyn Givens and Vencini Smith |
2:2024cv00227 |
February 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mohammad Jenkins, Phyllis Morgan, filed by Rosemary Collins.(Maxwell, Leroy) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristen Elyse Gochett on behalf of Rosemary Collins (Gochett, Kristen) |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER - On or before March 8, 2024, Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff does not comply with this order, the court may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 2/27/24. (SAC) |
Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 2/27/24. (SAC) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4537108. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Mohammad Jenkins, Phyllis Morgan, filed by Rosemary Collins.(CLD). (Maxwell, Leroy); USDC Receipt#: 10245 - Modified on 3/4/2024 (SAC). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mohammad Jenkins, Phyllis Morgan, filed by Rosemary Collins.(CLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.