Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Collins v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Collins
Defendant:
Mohammad Jenkins, Phyllis Morgan, Gwendolyn Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford-El v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv50378
Plaintiff:
Melvin Antoni Ford-El
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Winnebago County, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins, Rosemary v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Collins
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Ford-El v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv50254
Defendant:
City Of Elgin, Kane County, Cook County Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Antoni Ford-El
Trustee:
Scanning Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Redmond et al
as 3:2018cv50291
Defendant:
Tricia C., Gary Caruana, Doctor Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. Shore et al
as 3:2017cv50065
Plaintiff:
Natasha Belcher
Defendant:
Brian Dean Shore, Meredith Popkes, Mary Linn Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. McGraw et al
as 1:2016cv01229
Plaintiff:
Erick D Conway
Defendant:
Joseph G McGraw, Rosemary Collins, Cathrin Zenoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Taylor v. Melisa Forsyth, et al
as 16-12872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY N. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISA COMBS FORSYTH, Prison Psychologist, Jesup FCI, P. G. RIENHARD, Judge, RICHARD A. POSNER, Judge and others
Turner v. Collins et al
as 3:2016cv50009
Plaintiff:
Richard Turner
Defendant:
Rosemary Collins and Assistant Prosecuter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Forsyth et al
as 2:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Terry N. Taylor
Defendant:
Melisa Combs Forsyth, P.G. Rienhard, Richard A. Posner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
