Blount v. Thomas et al
Elliott Blount |
Thomas, Davenport and Graham |
4:2019cv00249 |
February 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Virginia Emerson Hopkins |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION for Demand of Jury Trial by Elliott Blount. (KWC) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Discovery - the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 3/4/2019. (KWC) |
Filing 7 ORDER striking #4 Motion for Jury Trial. Plaintiffs demand for a jury trial is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 3/4/2019. (KWC) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Davenport, Graham and Thomas, returned to Plaintiff for service via USPS on this the 27th day of February, 2019. (JLC) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Pre Trial Discovery by Elliott Blount. (JLC) |
Filing 4 ***STRICKEN - SEE ORDER DOC #7 *** MOTION for Demand of Jury Trial by Elliott Blount. (JLC) Modified on 3/4/2019 (KWC) |
Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING RULE 7.1. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 05/11/2016. (cm to pro se pla)(KWC) |
Filing 2 UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 2/12/2019. (cm to pro se pla)(KWC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Davenport, Graham, Thomas (Filing fee received from Elliott Blount in the amount of $400.00; receipt number B4601095370), filed by Elliott Blount.(KWC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.