Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jean v. City of Dallas, Georgia et al
as 4:2026cv00273
Plaintiff:
Freud Jean
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Georgia, Officer Jeff Ross, Officer Robert Obosla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webster Neumann v. Darren Jackson
as 26-6962
Plaintiff:
WEBSTER R. NEUMANN
Defendant:
DARREN JACKSON, GRAHAM ATKINSON, GREGORY MOSS, JR. and others
Graham v. Dolgencorp LLC et al
as 5:2026cv02509
Plaintiff:
Karen Graham
Defendant:
Dolgencorp LLC and Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Graham v. Atrium Hospitality LP
as 0:2026cv62549
Plaintiff:
Shekinah Graham
Defendant:
ATRIUM HOSPITALITY LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
conklin v. Payne et al
as 6:2026cv06931
Plaintiff:
chad robert conklin
Defendant:
Michael Payne, CRC Improvements Inc. and graham hershman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Graham v. Humphrey
as 5:2026cv00122
Petitioner:
Gary Graham
Respondent:
C. Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Graham County Board of Education v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv10179
Plaintiff:
Graham County Board of Education
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Payments, Inc., Siculus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Graham v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02981
Plaintiff:
George Graham
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
