Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,339
MILES v. GRAHAM
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant: MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner: Jonathan Graham
Respondent: Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant: Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2024cv00417
Plaintiff: Develin Dion Ray Lay
Defendant: Stephens County, Ken Graham and Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00790
Plaintiff: Sankona Graham
Defendant: State of Nevada, Jeremy Bean, Brandon Silber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant: SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. USA
as 3:2024cv00253
Petitioner: Erin F. Graham, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Spriggs v. Graham et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff: Jason Patrick Spriggs
Defendant: Corey Graham and Lutheran Kosciusko Hospital
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner: William Charles Graham
Respondent: T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff: Michael Allen Moody
Defendant: Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?