Tunink v. Astrue

Tunink v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Angela R. Tunink
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	1:2011cv00306
Filed:	June 10, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	William E. Cassady
Presiding Judge:	Callie V. S. Granade
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 27, 2011	Filing 20 JUDGMENT ent. in accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff benefits be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. The remand pursuant to sentence four of ' 405(g) makes the plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, and terminates this Court's jurisdiction over this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 12/27/2011. (mjn)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 27, 2011

Filing 20 JUDGMENT ent. in accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff benefits be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. The remand pursuant to sentence four of ' 405(g) makes the plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, and terminates this Court's jurisdiction over this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 12/27/2011. (mjn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tunink v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela R. Tunink
Represented By:	Byron A. Lassiter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?