Whitt v. Ivey et al
David Dewayne Whitt |
Jeff Dunn, Kay Ive, Cynthia Stewart and Kay Ivey |
1:2020cv00011 |
January 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Kristi K DuBose |
Katherine P Nelson |
Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Order granting Plaintiff an extension to sign and file the complaint being returned to him and to complete and file this Court's form for a motion to proceed without prepayment of fees, or pay the $400.00 filing fee, by 3/27/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 02/27/2020. (Copies mailed to Plaintiff as directed) (nah) |
Filing 3 Order for Plaintiff to sign and file the complaint being returned to him and to complete and file this Court's form for a motion to proceed without prepayment of fees, or, in lieu thereof, pay the $400.00 filing fee by 2/14/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 01/14/2020. (Copy of Order, original complaint and IFP form mailed to Plaintiff as directed) (nah) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Dewayne Whitt - Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson (PSU). (nah) |
Filing 1 1983 COMPLAINT against Jeff Dunn, Kay Ivey, Cynthia Stewart, filed by David Dewayne Whitt - Ref to MJ/Nelson (PSU). (nah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.