Pickett v. Ivey et al
Joe Ranger Pickett |
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Dwayne Spurlock, Eric S. Dreiband, Tim Bines, M. Owens, Leigh Gwathney, Richard Moore, Mark A. Smith, Darrel Weaver, U.S. Magistrate Sonja F. Bivins, Cam Ward and Cliff Walker |
1:2021cv00212 |
May 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
P Bradley Murray |
Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this action without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 6/28/21. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (cmj) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) because Pickett is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis and did not pay the filing and administrativefees at the time when he filed his complaint. Objections to R&R due 14 days from the date of service of this document. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 5/28/2021. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Remark - illegible hand written document from Joe Ranger Pickett re: Kay Ivey Governor, et al.; ref to Judge Murray (cmj) |
Filing 1 1983 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joe Ranger Pickett. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 8/3/2021; ref to Judge Murray/PSU (cmj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.