Jones et al v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Myron Williams, Sharon Walker, Kenneth Petty, Jamie Wiggins and James Jones |
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC |
1:2021cv00273 |
June 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
P Bradley Murray |
William H Steele |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by James Jones. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC waiver sent on 6/22/2021, answer due 8/21/2021. (Rosenthal, Ian) Modified on 6/30/2021 (cmj). |
Answer due from Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC on 8/21/2021 (cmj) |
Filing 3 Service Order entered 6/10/2021. Plaintiff to notify the Court the action taken to effect service and the results thereof. Service order deadline set to 7/26/2021.. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 6/10/2021. (cmj) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (cmj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC ( Filing fee $402 receipt number AALSDC-2820660, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by All Plaintiffs. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Fuquay, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.