Walker v. McDough
Gary E. Walker |
Chris McDough and Kay Ivey |
1:2023cv00085 |
March 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Sonja F Bivins |
Kristi K DuBose |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order GRANTING #5 MOTION To Forfill The Order (Extension of Time) filed by Gary E. Walker. Filing Fee due by 5/15/2023. Copy to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 4/20/2023. (meh) |
Filing 5 MOTION To Forfill The Order filed by Gary E. Walker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (fz) |
Filing 4 Order directing payment of partial filing fee re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to REMIT $2.50 by 4/14/2023. Plainitff's motion to appoint counsel is DENIED, as set out. Copy to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 3/15/2023. (meh) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Gary E. Walker (see page 7, section V of 1983 Complaint at doc #1 ). Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (meh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gary E. Walker. Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins (PSU). (meh) |
Filing 1 1983 COMPLAINT against Chris McDough, Kay Ivey filed by Gary E. Walker. Referred to MJ Bivins (PSU) (meh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/15/2023: #1 Attachment) (meh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.