Williams v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Leola Williams
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2009cv00540
Filed: August 20, 2009
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Selma Office
County: Perry
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Referring Judge: Katherine P. Nelson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 15, 2010 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 23 Motion for Attorney Fees (EAJA). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/15/10. (srr)
August 25, 2010 21 Opinion or Order of the Court Order that the decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff benefits was not based on substantial evidence and is due to be REVERSED and REMANDED for further evaluation and consideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 8/24/10. (srr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leola Williams
Represented By: William T. Coplin, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?