James v. Official's Bethel Jail et al
| Paul R. James, Jr. |
| Official's Bethel Jail, DOC, Andrew Carl and Kargas |
| 3:2022cv00269 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PRISONER'S COMPLAINT UNDER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Andrew Carl, DOC, Kargas, filed by Paul R. James, Jr.(LMH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Compelling and Press for Impeachment by Paul R. James, Jr.(LMH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner's Application to Waive Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Paul R. James, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(LMH, COURT STAFF) Modified on 2/3/2023 to correct filed date (LMH, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 3
ORDER RE: DEFICIENT FILING: Plaintiff to file complaint in conformance with the applicable rules of court by 1/30/2023. Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file application to waive prepayment of the filing fee by 1/30/2023. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 12/30/2022. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 2 Civil Rule 4(f) Affidavit Summons for Tampering with Evidence & Sexual Harassment by Paul R. James, Jr. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Affidavit Regarding, Tampering with Evidence Sexual Harassments against DOC, Official's Bethel Jail, filed by Paul R. James, Jr.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
