Cases 1 - 10 of 3,192
Carter v. Stubbs et al
as 1:2024mc00192
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Calli A. Stubbs and DOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Vaughan v. Burnice Mace
as 24-6317
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Defendant:
BURNICE MACE, RN, BSN, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, in whole capacity, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Donald Vaughan v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6290
Petitioner:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Arcona v. Camden County Druo Court et al
as 1:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arcona
Defendant:
Camden County Druo Court, New Brunswick Police Dept., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Fischer
as 24-793
Defendant:
Ms. DIGNEAN, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, THOMAS TANEA, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of DOCCS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIS RICHARD
Morales v. MN DOC et al
as 0:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Morales
Defendant:
MN DOC, MCF - Faribault, Jodi Atinsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Busby v. Doris Falkenrath, et al
as 24-1653
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Busby
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC, Andrea Galbreath, Sergeant, JCCC, MO DOC and Ike, Corrections Officer, MO DOC
Moore v. Warden Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Allan Moore
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Chief Witmore, O.M.D. and Director Dzurenda, Doc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
