Lambert v. State of Alaska et al
| Newton Lambert |
| State of Alaska and Richard Subodny |
| 3:2025cv00049 |
| March 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION (LMH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Case is DISMISSED without prejudice. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 7/10/25. (LMH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT re #7 MOTION to Vacate by Newton Lambert. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Vacate Conviction by Newton Lambert. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Newton Lambert. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 5 Unissued subpoena re State of Alaska. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL RIGHTS CASES FILED BY SELF-REPRESENTED PRISONERS Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 3/13/2025. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Newton Lambert. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Alaska, Richard Subodny, filed by Newton Lambert.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
