Caston v. Compaq Computer Corp, et al
| Charles Caston |
| IBM, Intel, Compaq Computer Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Sprint PC, Gateway, Hewlett-Packard Company, Nextel Wireless, Brooklyn University, Dell, University of South Carolina, Yale University and Harvard University |
| 2:2002cv00905 |
| May 15, 2002 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Virginia A Mathis |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2003. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Mag Judge Virginia A. Mathis thatthis case is hereby dismissed pursuant to Pla's failure to comply with Court Orders terminating case (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (ADI-ICMS, ).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Stephen M. McNamee hereby reassigning this case by random draw to another Judge in this District FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random lot to Mag Judge Virginia A. Mathis All future pleadings and documents shall reflect the case number: CIV-02-905-PHX-VAM (cc: all counsel/VAM) (MAP) (ADI-ICMS, ).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Roslyn O. Silver that this matter has been referred to the Honorable Judge Stephen M McNamee for further reassignment as appropriate; Case reassigned to Judge Stephen M. McNamee (with notice sent) (cc: all counsel) (SAT) (ADI-ICMS, ).
|
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER that pursuant to court order filed [4-1] Judge Earl H Carroll recuses himself from this case Case reassigned by random lot to Judge Roslyn O. Silver All further pleadings and documents shall contain the following case number: CIV 02-905-PHX-ROS (cc: all counsel) [5-2] (SAT) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Earl H. Carroll that the Court recuses itself from further proceedings in the above-entitled case and the Clerk shall reassign it by random lot (cc: all counsel) re: order filed [4-1] (SAT) (ADI-ICMS, ).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER by Judge Earl H. Carroll denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis and supporting information by pla [2-1], and dismissing the complaint [1-1] for failure to state a claim without prejudice; pls shall file another motion to proceed in forma pauperis with an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. The failure to file an amended complaint within 30 days of this order will result in the dismissal of the action ; possbl dsm ddl set for 6/21/02 (cc: all counsel) (CMM) (ADI-ICMS, ).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis and supporting information by pla [2-1] (CMM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FILED (ESH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
