Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Holmes et al v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
as 7:2026cv07361
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Holmes
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation and The IBM Personal Pension Plan Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Guerriere v. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
as 1:2026cv25401
Plaintiff:
Mariana Ines Guerriere
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Altun v. IBM Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv06532
Plaintiff:
Sukran Altun
Defendant:
IBM Corporation and Flik Hospitality
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Comstock v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2026cv01938
Plaintiff:
Carolynn Comstock
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Misaka Network Inc, Yahoo Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Comstock v. Microsoft Corporation et al.
as 3:2026cv01266
Plaintiff:
Carolynn Comstock
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Misaka Network, Inc., Yahoo Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee v. Menegaux et al
as 1:2026cv02251
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Florent Menegaux, Michelin, Mike Lugtters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Comstock v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2026cv00039
Plaintiff:
Carolynn Comstock
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Meta Platforms, Inc., Travelers Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Comstock v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2026cv01307
Plaintiff:
Carolynn Comstock
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, OpenAI Inc, Anthropic PBC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
