T-Mobile West Corporation v Crow, et al.
| T-Mobile West Corporation |
| Michael M. Crow, Arizona State University, Arizona Board of Regents, Fred Boice, Robert Bulla, Ernest Calderon, Dennis DeConcini, Fred Duval, Luann Leonard, Anne Mariucci, David Martinez, III, Bob McLendon, Ross Meyer, Janet Napolitano, Tom Horne and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2008cv01337 |
| July 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1 |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
152
ORDER that Plaintiffs (1) Motion to Allow the Expert Witness Designation of Dr. Hal J. Singer in Light of the Courts Order of December 17, 2009 and (2) Opposition to NextG Defendants Objection to the Expert Report of Daniel Paul (doc. # 142) is grant ed in part and denied in part. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to amend the Scheduling Order to permit its designation of Dr. Singer as an expert witness is denied.FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants objection to Daniel Pauls expert testimony for failure to produce a written report by the deadline for retained experts reports is overruled.. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 4/23/2010.(TCA)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion 90 for Partial Summary Judgment on Its First and Fourth Claims for Relief is denied. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 12/16/09.(KMG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
