Nordstrom # 86114 v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 5, 2016
ORDER: Judgment is entered against Plaintiff on all claims in his complaint and his request for declaratory and injunctive relief 5 is denied; Defendant's motion to supplement 81 is granted; Plaintiff's motion to supplement 83 is denied as moot; the Clerk shall enter a written judgment in favor of Defendant and terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/5/16. (REW)
|March 27, 2012
ORDER - Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 5) and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment. The Clerk of Court must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for f ailure to state a claim may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/26/12. (DMT)
|January 18, 2012
ORDER, the 1 Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is filed to file a first amended complaint. If plaintiff fails to timely comply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/17/12. (DMT)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?