Cases 1 - 10 of 10,521
Stamnes et al v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A., et al
as 0:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
David Klingler, Joan Ramos, Bruce McGeoch and others
Defendant:
Dividend Finance, Inc. and Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Carmona v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00412
Defendant:
Oscar Ortiz, Walmart Inc., Brendon Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandrina Carmona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv01155
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
USA v. Pardo-Ramos
as 24-50799
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Martin Pardo-Ramos
Karl Masek v. USA, et al
as 24-5226
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Turpin, Deputy Sergeant and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Ray Masek
RAMOS v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv23892
Plaintiff:
EVELYN RAMOS
Defendant:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
PERRY v. MARION COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv01760
Defendant:
AARON RAMOS, MARION COUNTY, IMPD and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03804
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Armando Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Marion County Justice Center et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Andre Perry
Defendant:
Marion County, IMPD, Marion County Justice Center and others
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
