FutureFuel Chemical Company v. Vinmar Overseas Ltd

Plaintiff: FutureFuel Chemical Company
Defendant: Vinmar Overseas Ltd
Case Number: 1:2008cv00071
Filed: December 29, 2008
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: William R. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 6, 2009 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 15 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss ; case is DISMISSED; all other pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 2/6/09. (mkf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FutureFuel Chemical Company v. Vinmar Overseas Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FutureFuel Chemical Company
Represented By: Steven L. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vinmar Overseas Ltd
Represented By: Stephen H. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?