Robertson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
| William C Robertson and Carey W Robertson |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company and XTO Energy Inc |
| 1:2009cv00020 |
| May 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Real Property |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
JUDGMENT pursuant to 42 Opinion and Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Union Pacific Railroad Company and XTO Energy Inc, dismissing the complaint of Carey W Robertson and William C Robertson with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/24/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 31 Joint Motion to Stay all proceedings in this action. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/8/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING pltfs' 28 Motion to Stay Motion for Reconsideration; deferring ruling on 26 Motion for Reconsideration until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issues a ruling on the petition for rehearing in Griffis v. Anadarko E & P Company, LP; parties are directed to notify the Court when the Eighth Circuit rules on the petition for rehearing. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/7/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
22
OPINION AND ORDER that 6 Defts' Motion for Summary Judgment and 15 Pltfs' Motion for Summary Judgment are hereby DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/16/09. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
