Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Weggeland Development Group Ltd et al
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| Weggeland Development Group Ltd and Steven Weggeland |
| 1:2010cv00018 |
| April 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Default of Promissory Note |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT : The Court enters judgment on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's complaint against Weggeland Development Group, Ltd. for $93,678.88. This total reflects $63,302.92 in principal, $9,672.77 in fees, $20,676.1 6 in pre-judgment interest, and $27.03 in court costs. This judgment will bear post-judgment interest at 0.18% per annum from this order's date until the judgment is paid. 28 U.5.C.A. § 1961(a)-(b) (West 2006).. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/7/11. (hph)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting pltf's 8 Motion for Default Judgment against Weggeland Development Group Ltd; granting pltf's 11 Motion to Dismiss Steven Weggeland without prejudice because he is in bankruptcy; pltf is directed to file a supplemental affidavit as soon as possible calculating interest through 6/9/11. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/27/11. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
