Edwards v. Kelley et al
| Stephen Edwards |
| Wendy Kelley, Anderson, Bernard Williams, Corizon Medical Services Inc, Michelle Bishop, Irvin, Jodie Lafevers, David White, Ray Hobbs, Does and David Ware |
| 1:2012cv00044 |
| May 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Hot Spring |
| Beth Deere |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
JUDGMENT consistent with 144 Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/21/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER ADOPTING 86 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, defts' 83 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and pltf's claims against defts Hallworth and Courtney are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/31/13. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER directing the U.S. Marshal to serve summons and complaint on Drs. Irvin and Anderson (ADDRESSES UNDER SEAL), and on David White, without prepayment of fees and costs; the Clerk is directed to correct names of defts Anderson and Irvin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/13/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING 27 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's 26 Motion to supplement his Complaint and for Injunctive Relief is DENIED. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/11/12. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
