Hopson v. Glenn et al
| Dwight C Hopson |
| Wendy Kelly, John Maples, Betty Hutchinson, Preston Glenn and Melvin Nance |
| 1:2012cv00046 |
| May 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER ADOPTING 49 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge, granting Defendants' 35 , 38 and 42 Motions for Summary Judgment. Hopson's claims against Hutchinson, Nance, Page and Ramsey are dismissed without prejudice. His claims against Glenn are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/6/2013. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING 12 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing Hopson's claims against Kelly, Maples, and Yarbrough, without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/12/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER directing the Clerk to mail the Section 1983 complaint form to Plaintiff; directing Plaintiff, if he wishes to amend his original Complaint, to complete the new complaint form in its entirety, mark it as "Amended Complaint, and file within 30 days of the date of this Order; finding portions of Plaintiff's Complaint, as it now stands, are deficient and may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this Order; and finding service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/15/2012. (srw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
