Meadows v. Anderson et al
| Terese Marie Meadows |
| Donald Anderson, Bobbie Allison, Corizon Inc, James Hooper, Brenda Tetrick, Simmons, Linda Dixon and Earnest Winkle |
| 1:2012cv00089 |
| September 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| Beth Deere |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER ADOPTING 103 the recommended disposition; granting 81 the defendants' motion for summary judgment, and dismissing, with prejudice, plaintiff's claims against Bobbie Allison, Donald Anderson, Corizon Inc., Jennifer Simmons, and Brenda Tetrick; and denying as moot 105 the plaintiff's motion for ruling. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/7/2014. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER adopting 5 Partial Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge. Defendants Donald Anderson, Linda Dixon, and Corizon, Inc., are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs claims for violations of the Arkansas Rights of the Terminally Ill or Permanently Unconscious Act, the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, the First Amendment, and the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment are dismissed without prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/19/2012. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
