Mason v. Harrison et al
| Uaron Mason |
| Ray Hobbs, Edward Harrison and Clinton Baker |
| 1:2013cv00071 |
| August 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
JUDGMENT pursuant to 77 Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, dismissed with prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/15/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER re 31 MOTION to Produce filed by Uaron Mason. This motion should be re-docketed as evidence in support of the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/29/14. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 35 Motion for Issuance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 01/16/2014. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying 27 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/6/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER re 25 MOTION for Copies filed by Uaron Mason. This motion shall be re-docketed as a request for production from defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 10/25/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, defts Harrison and Hobbs are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/17/13. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
