McClure v. Weekly
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 26, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING 16 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Pr ison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); it is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/26/2014. (kdr)
|January 6, 2014
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint within fifteen days from the date of this Order. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff the Court-provided 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint form. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/6/2014. (jak)
|November 14, 2013
JUDGMENT: Consistent with 6 Order, case dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/14/2013. (rhm)
|October 1, 2013
ORDER denying, without prejudice, the 2 application to proceed ifp because the plaintiff has not included the necessary financial information in support. The plaintiff shall submit either the $400 statutory filing fee or a completed ifp appl ication within 30 days of the entry date of this Order. The Clerk shall send to plaintiff an ifp application and calculation sheet. The Clerk shall also forward copies of this Order to the Warden of the Grimes Unit, 300 Correction Drive, Newport, AR 72112. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 10/1/13. (kpr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?