Murphy v. Hughes et al
Lisa Murphy |
J Hughes, Heather Hutton-Glover, Booker and Austin |
1:2014cv00006 |
January 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Batesville Office |
Jackson |
J. Leon Holmes |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 55 Order entered on this day, this case is dismissed. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/29/2015. (ks) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting 39 Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Status of the case. The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet and the Initial Scheduled Order 31 . Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/16/2014. (kcs) |
Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Murphy's claims against Hutton-Glover, Booker, and Austin are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Hughes, Cole, Husten, Warsham, and Williams, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, substituted complaint, and this Opinion and Order on them through the Humphries & Odum law firm without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/24/2014. (ks) |
Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER FOR pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 02/19/2014. (kcs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.