Obamas et al v. Nance et al
| Jack Freeman |
| Billy Cowell, Jennifer Horn, Tiera Pickering and Melvin Nance |
| 1:2014cv00029 |
| April 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 44 Order entered today, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/03/2014. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 35 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED PARTIAL DISTRIBUTION in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying Plaintiff's 20 motion to order a stay in transfer; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2014. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay; denying 25 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Expert Witness; denying 28 Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas; and granting 21 Defendants' Motion to Take Deposition from Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 08/25/2014. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
3
INITIAL ORDER FOR pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 04/17/2014. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
