Davis v. Standford et al
| Brent Lavon Davis |
| Ronda Standford, Billy Cowell and Marcus Wilkerson |
| 1:2014cv00046 |
| May 8, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
JUDGMENT: Davis's claims against Cowell are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Davis's claim against Stanford is dismissed with prejudice. Davis's inadequate-medical-care claim against Wilkerson is dismissed with prejudice. Davis's other claims against Wilkerson are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/18/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER adopting unopposed partial recommendations, 79 and 80 with one change. Wilkerson's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, 29 , is granted. Davis may proceed with his claim that Wilkerson denied him adequate medical care on 24 September 2013. Davis's other claims against Wilkerson are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Cowell and Stanford's Motion for Summary Judgment, 57 , is granted. Davis's claims against Cowell are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Davis's claim against Stanford is dismissed with prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/17/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER: Motion 74 granted. The stay is lifted. Wilkerson's motion, 29 is reinstated. And he may move for summary judgment on any remaining claims within 21 days after the Court resolves the current motion. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/12/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying 49 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and 53 Motion for Copy of Deposition, as moot; and denying 52 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 02/26/2015. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER granting in part 56 Motion to Stay. The stay only applies to Davis's 1983 claims against Wilkerson, and not those Davis has raised against Rhonda Stanford and Billy Cowell. To better manage the Court's docket, Wilkerson's mot ion for partial summary judgment, 29 , is denied without prejudice. It may be reinstated by notice if and when the automatic stay is lifted by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/25/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER adopting 44 Recommendation. Motion for judgment on the pleadings, 27 , denied. The Court directs the Clerk to file a copy of 42 as Davis's Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/12/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER directing the Plaintiff to file within 30 days, a Response to 29 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Marcus Wilkerson; Plaintiff is reminded that if he fails to timely do so, his claims against Defendant Wilkerson will be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/16/2014. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER adopting 22 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition. Davis's motion for injunctive relief, 8 , is denied as unsupported. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/28/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
3
INITIAL ORDER FOR pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 05/09/2014. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
