Sieber v. Benton et al
| Austin Lee Sieber |
| Jason Benton, Jon Furgeson and Steven Jefferys |
| 1:2014cv00055 |
| May 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Independence |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 54 Order entered in this matter on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/12/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 6 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED PARTIAL DISPOSITION in its entirety; allowing Mr. Sieber to proceed with his claims against defendant Jason Benton for excessive force and failure to protect; dismissing all other cla ims and defendants without prejudice; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Mr. Benton; directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, 5 Substituted Complaint, and this Order on Mr. Benton without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 03/23/2015. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
3
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 05/22/2014. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
