Halton v. Swain et al
| Christine Halton |
| Richard Swain, Kim Rackley and Vaughn |
| 1:2014cv00118 |
| September 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file within 30 days a Response to 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Teresa Vaughn, Diane Lackey, Richard Swain, Kim Rackley that complies with the Local Rule and the instructions in this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 03/06/2015. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting 11 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff is allowed to PROCEED with her inadequate medical care claims against defendants Richard Swain and Te resa Vaughn. Defendants Kim Rackley and Diane Lackey are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to prepare summons for defendants Richard Swain and Teresa Vaughn and that service be effected by the United States Marshal. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/10/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
2
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/26/2014. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
