Roberts et al v. Unimin Corporation
| Kathy Roberts and Karen McShane |
| Unimin Corporation |
| 1:2015cv00071 |
| June 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Izard |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 124 Opinion and Order entered separately today, judgment is entered in favor of Unumin Corporation against Kathy Roberts and Karen McShane, jointly and severally, in the amount of $2,225.60 plus post-judgment interest to accrue at the rate of 0.82% per annum, for all of which garnishment and execution may issue. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/05/2016. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
73
FORMAL ORDER from the Arkansas Supreme Court denying Appellee's Motion to Reconsider. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
70
CERTIFICATION ORDER certifying to the Supreme Court of Arkansas a question of law that may be determinative of this case. The Clerk is hereby directed to forward this Certification Order to the Supreme Court of Arkansas under his official seal. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/25/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
26
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER denying 12 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/11/2015. (ks)
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION AND ORDER denying Unimin Corporation's 12 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/7/2015. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
