King v. Banks et al
Zachery King |
James Banks, Raylina Ramsey, Robert Reicherd and Brenda Bridgeman |
1:2015cv00090 |
August 18, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Batesville Office |
Jackson |
James M. Moody |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER ADOPTING 49 Recommended Partial Disposition. Defendants' 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part: All claims against Ring are dismissed with prejudice. All claims against Lee are dismissed without prejudice. King's 5/20/2015 failure to protect claim against Ramsey is dismissed without prejudice. King may proceed with his 6/3/2015 failure to protect claims against Ramsey and Howard. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/12/2016. (mcz) |
Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING 7 Recommended Partial Disposition.Plaintiff may proceed with his Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim against Defendants Ramsey, Howard, Lee and Ring. All other claims and Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Defendants Ramsey, Howard, Lee and Ring. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the complaint, amended complaint and this Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/26/2015. (mcz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.