Edgin v. Correct Care Services et al
| Fred Edgin |
| Correct Care Services, Heeryman, Shah and Does |
| 1:2015cv00114 |
| October 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Out of State |
| Patricia S. Harris |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER Adopting 98 Report and Recommendations in their entirety. Defendant Shah's 90 Motion to Dismiss is granted, and the case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/13/2017. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER adopting in its entirety the 88 partial recommended disposition; and dismissing without prejudice Edgin's claims against the Doe defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/20/2017. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER adopting 81 the partial recommended disposition; granting 74 defendants Michelle Arnold and Regina Lynch's motion to dismiss; and denying as moot 72 the motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/9/2017. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER adopting the 68 partial recommended disposition; granting the 59 motion for summary judgment; and dismissing Plaintiff Fred Edgin's claims against Amanda Davis and Linda Hunt without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 02/21/2017. (rhm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
