Burke v. Kelley et al
| Stanley K Burke |
| Hearyman, Rhoder, Shipman, Hall, Duran and Murry |
| 1:2016cv00098 |
| August 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Izard |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 47 Order that was entered on this day, it is Considered, Ordered, and Adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/28/2017. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety the 7 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's finding in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Defendants Kelley, Williams, Day, Griffin, ADC, and Correct Care Solutions; directing the Clerk of the Court to amend the docket to reflect the correct spelling of Defendant Wendy Kelley; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/19/2016. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
