Meadows v. Richarson et al
| Terese Marie Meadows |
| Michael Richarson, Ward, Correct Care Solutions, Joesph Huges, Judy Baisa, Opal Bledsoe and Does |
| 1:2017cv00056 |
| July 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| James M. Moody |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
JUDGMENT: Consistent with 78 Order that was entered on this day, this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/13/2018. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Adopting 53 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. The Clerk is directed to amend the docket to reflect the full and correct names of Defendants Michael Richardson, Mark Ward, Joseph Hughes, Judy Baiza, and Debby Baumgarner. The ADC Defendants' 39 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Plaintiff's claims against them are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; Defendants Richardson and Ward are dismissed. The Medical De fendants' 46 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Baumgarner are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/26/2018. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Adopting 12 and 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed on her excessive force claims, and her related claims regarding treatment of those injuries, against Defendants Richarson, Ward, Huges, Baisa, Bl edsoe, and Bummgartener. Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim regarding treatment of her hepatitis C is dismissed from this action without prejudice. Defendants Correct Care Solutions and Does are dismissed from this action without prejudi ce. Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Injunctive Relief is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/23/2017. (mcz) (Docket text modified on 10/23/2017 to correct the description of the document filed)(jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
