Worsham v. Hairyman et al
Christopher Worsham |
Hairyman, Wendy Kelley, Stephen Williams and Does |
1:2017cv00069 |
August 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Batesville Office |
Izard |
Beth Deere |
J. Leon Holmes |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 JUDGMENT: Consistent with 57 Order that was entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/21/2018. (ljb) |
Filing 39 ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 34 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and dismissing Worsham's claims against the Doe defendants. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/4/2018. (ljb) |
Filing 35 ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 31 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and denying Christopher Worsham's 23 and 30 motions for preliminary injunctive relief. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/12/2017. (ljb) |
Filing 32 ORDER approving and adopting the 20 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting in part and denying in part the 8 ADC Defendants' motion to dismiss; and denying 15 Worsham's motion for preliminary injunction. Worsham's claims against the ADC Defendants in their official capacity for money damages are dismissed, with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/7/2017. (ljb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.