Martz v. Brandon et al
| Hollis Devin Martz |
| Christopher Brandon, Dalton Wayne Wallace, Garrett Gillihan, Gilliaspie, Sanders, Lonny Brown, Cooper, Karen Payne, Stephen Williams, Billy Inman, Keith Wilhite, Cody Douglas, Corey Brewer, Tolar, Dexter Payne and Wendy Kelley |
| 1:2018cv00024 |
| April 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jefferson |
| James M. Moody |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT: Consistent with 32 Order that was entered on this day, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/21/2018. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Adopting 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed on his excessive force claims and related claims arising from the 6/14/2017 incident against Defendants Christopher Brandon, Dalton Wayne Wallace, Gilliasp ie, Sanders, Lonny Brown, and Cooper. All other claims are dismissed from this action without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/8/2018. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
