Jones v. Baker et al
| Jay Jones |
| Daniel Golden, Roger Faust, Clinton Baker, Joshua Mullins and Harris |
| 1:2018cv00051 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| Patricia S Harris |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Jones's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/7/2018. (jak) |
Filing 4
ORDER withdrawing the reference. Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/7/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS denying without prejudice #1 IFP application; directing the Clerk of Court to enclose an IFP application with a copy of this order; and directing Jones to return a completed IFP application or pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 7/27/2018. (ljb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jay Jones. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jay Jones. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
